See a hairstyle before the haircut


Existing demo images. A styling simulation, not a prediction. The report includes 6 optional AI renders; each is generated on request.
A positive canthal tilt means the outer corner of your eye sits higher than the inner one. It has become the most talked-about facial measurement online — which is exactly why it is worth separating what is measured from what is claimed.
Draw a line from the medial canthus — the inner corner of your eye — to the lateral canthus, the outer corner. Compare that line to the horizontal. If the outer corner is higher, the tilt is positive.
That is the entire definition. It is a two-point measurement, which is part of why it spread so widely online: it is easy to demonstrate on a photo, easy to argue about, and easy to present as a verdict.
Our reporting bands: 2° and above positive, 0–2° neutral, below 0° negative. Other sources draw them elsewhere, and none of the boundaries are medical.
Three things came together. It is visible — you can draw the line on a photo and everyone sees it. It is a single number, which makes it rankable in a way that "your eyes look kind" is not. And it arrived alongside a vocabulary — hunter eyes, prey eyes, PSL — that gave people a way to talk about faces as if the categories were established facts.
None of that makes the measurement wrong. It makes the conclusions attached to it worth checking separately.
| Claim you will see online | Verdict | What is actually known |
|---|---|---|
| Positive tilt is universally more attractive | Overstated | Reviews of facial attractiveness find symmetry, averageness and sexual dimorphism hold up across cultures. A specific preferred eye angle is not on that list, and a 2024 literature summary reports limited and conflicting evidence for a universal preferred tilt |
| "Hunter eyes" require positive tilt | Not a real category | It is an internet term, not an anatomical one. It bundles tilt with brow position, orbital depth and lid exposure — several separate things given one name |
| Most attractive people have strongly positive tilt | Unsupported | Published means cluster a few degrees positive with a wide spread. Strongly positive is uncommon, including among people generally considered attractive |
| You can train it upward | No | There is no muscle between the canthi. Exercise and mewing claims do not apply here |
| A more positive tilt always photographs better | Depends | Strongly upturned eyes can read as harder or more intense, which is not what everyone wants. There is no direction that is better in every context |
| Your tilt is a fixed number | No | Head pitch moves it by several degrees. Half the variation people attribute to their face is actually camera angle |
Reviews of facial attractiveness have found consistent, cross-cultural preferences for three things: averageness, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. That is a real finding with meta-analytic support behind it.
A specific preferred eye angle is not one of the three. A 2024 literature summary in a surgical journal looked at the evidence behind facial aesthetic ideals and reported it as limited and heterogeneous, with active debate over whether a universally preferred canthal tilt exists at all. That is a long way from the confidence with which the number gets discussed online.
It is also worth saying what a strongly positive tilt does in practice: it tends to read as more intense, more alert, sometimes harder. Whether that is what you want depends entirely on what you want to look like — which is a question about you, not about a number.
Nothing short of surgery moves the canthi, and this site gives no surgical advice. What changes how the eye reads:
A brow tail that drops below the brow head pulls the whole eye region downward visually, whatever the canthi are doing. This is the highest-leverage change for most people.
From the outer corner, angled toward the tail of the brow. Redirects the visual axis of the eye directly.
Even lashes across the whole lid do nothing for the line; weight concentrated outward lifts it.
Not a cosmetic trick — just the difference between measuring your face and measuring your head angle. Shooting from slightly above adds apparent positive tilt, which is why so many selfies are taken that way.
The looksmaxxing framing treats facial measurements as a scoreboard with a correct answer. This site measures the same things and deliberately does not draw that conclusion: the number tells you where two points sit, and what follows from that is a styling question, not a verdict on your face. If a page tells you that a measurement makes you deficient, it is selling you something.
Wondering what can actually be changed? What moves a canthal tilt and what does not goes through brows, liner, camera angle and what surgery involves.
Wondering how the bands relate to each other? Negative vs positive canthal tilt compares all three side by side.
The outer corner of your eye sits higher than the inner corner, so the line between them tilts upward and the eye reads as upturned. On this site anything 2 degrees and above is reported as positive, 0 to 2 degrees as level, and below 0 degrees as negative.
There is no single boundary everyone agrees on. Published measurements on adults cluster a few degrees positive with a wide spread on either side, and the figure varies by population and by measurement method. We draw the line at 6 degrees for reporting, which is a convention, not a medical threshold.
Less clearly than the internet suggests. Symmetry, averageness and sexual dimorphism are supported by cross-cultural reviews of attractiveness; a specific preferred eye angle is not, and a 2024 literature summary reports limited and conflicting evidence for a universal preferred tilt. Strongly upturned eyes can also read as harder rather than warmer, which is a trade-off rather than an upgrade.
An internet term rather than an anatomical one. It bundles several separate features — canthal tilt, brow position, how deep the eye sits, how much upper lid shows — under one label. Because it is not one measurable thing, you cannot meaningfully be told whether you have it.
Run the free canthal tilt test here. It finds both eye corners from a 478-point face model, measures each eye against the horizontal and averages them. Use a front-facing photo with the camera level with your eyes and your chin neutral, because head angle changes the result by several degrees. The photo is never uploaded.
It can change how the eye reads, not the anatomy. Liner extended upward and outward from the outer corner, lash weight concentrated in the outer third, and a brow tail kept level or slightly lifted all shift the impression. The measured angle stays where it was.
Both eye corners found from a 478-point model, each eye measured against the horizontal and averaged. Nothing uploaded.
Front-facing, unobstructed, evenly lit photos work best. Your photo is analysed on your phone or computer and is never uploaded.
Your shape is a starting point. The report uses your measured proportions to explain hair and frame choices.
US$12.99 US$6.99 46% off One-time payment. No subscription, no account.
Your report link and receipt go here (optional, checkout asks too)
Next: secure checkout by Waffo, charged in USD.
Checkout could not open just now. Leave your email and we will tell you the moment it is fixed.
Got it, thanks.
Not happy within 7 days? Email us for a full refund.
Explore a sample before you decide. Your own report uses your measurements; these examples show the format, not your result.


Existing demo images. A styling simulation, not a prediction. The report includes 6 optional AI renders; each is generated on request.
Softly rectangular frames with moderate lens depth and a frame width close to the face
Excerpt from the published sampleReshape the hair silhouette with crown lift, below-jaw length, and controlled sides.