See a hairstyle before the haircut


Existing demo images. A styling simulation, not a prediction. The report includes 6 optional AI renders; each is generated on request.
A negative canthal tilt means the outer corner of your eye sits lower than the inner corner. Here is how it is measured, why your own photos disagree with each other, and which of the things people recommend actually change anything.
Two points define it. The medial canthus is the inner corner of your eye, where the upper and lower lids meet beside the nose. The lateral canthus is the outer corner. Draw a line between them, compare it to the horizontal, and the angle is your canthal tilt.
If the outer corner sits higher, the tilt is positive and the eye reads as upturned. If it sits lower, the tilt is negative and the eye reads as downturned. If they are level, it is neutral. That is the whole definition — there is nothing more to it than where two points sit.
On this site the bands are: below 0° negative, 0–2° neutral, 2° and above positive. Those are reporting boundaries for a photo measurement, not medical thresholds, and other sources draw them differently.
Published measurements on adults cluster a few degrees positive, with a wide spread either side, and the figure varies by population and by how the measurement is taken — direct anthropometry, photograph and CT do not agree with each other. A clinical study of Korean patients found a mean above 8°; Western sources commonly quote around 4–5°. There is no single number that "should" be true of a face.
So a negative reading tells you where your canthi sit relative to a convention. It does not tell you that something is wrong, and this page will not pretend otherwise.
| Change | Does it move the measurement? | What it actually does |
|---|---|---|
| Camera height | Yes — several degrees | Shooting from above adds apparent positive tilt; from below takes it away. The single largest source of variation between your own photos |
| Chin position | Yes — several degrees | Tucking the chin down tilts the whole eye line. Keep it neutral if you want a stable number |
| Brow shape | No | The measurement is eye corner to eye corner. But a brow tail that drops below the brow head reads as downturned, and lifting the tail changes that impression |
| Eyeliner | No | Extending the outer corner upward changes how the eye reads without touching the anatomy. The most direct cosmetic lever there is |
| Lash emphasis | No | Concentrating length at the outer third lifts the visual line of the eye |
| Sleep, water, salt | No | Puffiness changes the eyelid, not the canthi. It can make a tired face read more downturned without the angle moving |
| Age | Slowly | Lateral canthal position does drift downward over decades. Nothing you do this month affects it |
| Mewing, face exercises | No | There is no muscle between the canthi to train. Claims otherwise are not supported |
The number you measure is mostly the shape of what sits underneath, not something you are or are not doing. Four things account for nearly all of it.
The bony edge of the eye socket, and how far the cheekbone projects beneath it. The outer corner is anchored to that rim, so where the rim sits largely decides where the corner sits. This is inherited and does not change in adulthood.
The lateral canthal tendon fastens the outer corner to the rim, and its height on the rim varies from person to person. That variation on its own is worth several degrees.
The lower lid needs something to rest against. Support in this area changes gradually with age, and both the amount and the direction of that change vary a lot between people.
Published averages differ by population and by how the measurement was taken. Comparing your number against an average measured on a different group, or by a different method, is not comparing like with like.
None of that is a verdict, and none of it is actionable in the way the internet implies. It is simply why the angle is stable for most people, and why everything in the next two sections changes the impression rather than the measurement. What surgery involves — and what it does not promise — is on what moves a canthal tilt and what does not.
This is the most useful thing on this page, because it explains most of the variation people worry about.
Head pitch dominates. Tilting your chin down, or holding the camera above eye level, rotates the whole eye line and adds apparent positive tilt. Lifting your chin, or shooting from below, takes it away. The effect is worth several degrees — larger than the difference between the bands above. If you measure yourself twice and get different answers, this is almost always why.
Lens distance matters too. A phone held close with a wide lens stretches whatever is nearest the camera. Step back and zoom slightly and the geometry settles.
So standardise it. Camera level with your eyes, chin neutral, looking straight into the lens, even light on both sides. Measure the same way each time and the number becomes comparable to itself, which is the only comparison worth making.
Search this term and one of the first things you will find is somebody posting a photo and asking why one of their eyes is more negative than the other. It is the most common follow-up question there is, and it has a dull answer: almost nobody is symmetrical.
A difference between your eyes is the normal case. Left and right routinely differ in eyelid height, brow height and canthal position, including on the faces used as reference photographs. A degree or two between your own two eyes is unremarkable.
Some of the difference is not real. If your head is turned even slightly, the eye further from the camera is foreshortened, its two corners land closer together, and the measured angle shifts. Uneven light does something similar by moving where the outer corner appears to be. Both are artefacts of the photograph, and both disappear when you reshoot square to the lens.
So measure it twice. The test on this site reports each eye separately along with the gap between them, and draws the two measured lines on your own photo so you can see where the corners were placed. Shoot twice in separate sessions and compare the gap rather than a single reading: a gap that holds steady across both is probably real, and one that moves around was the photograph.
One case is worth separating out. A difference you have always had is an appearance question. A difference that is new, or that is getting larger, is a different matter, and when an eyelid change needs medical attention describes what that looks like.
Nothing short of surgery moves the canthi, and this site gives no surgical advice. But how an eye reads is not only the angle:
If the outer end of the brow sits lower than the inner end, the whole eye region reads as downturned regardless of where the canthi are. Keeping the tail at or slightly above the level of the brow head changes the impression more reliably than anything done to the eye itself.
Extending the line upward and outward from the outer corner redirects the eye's visual axis. This is the single most direct cosmetic lever, and it is why the same face can look upturned in one photo and not in another.
Concentrating length and volume in the outer third lifts the visual line; even lashes all the way across do not.
Flat frontal light fills the socket and flattens the whole region. Light from a little above and to one side restores the shadow that defines the eye shape.
Face exercises and mewing. There is no muscle between the inner and outer canthus that training could shorten. Tongue posture claims about the midface do not extend to canthal position.
Sleep, hydration and salt. These change eyelid puffiness, which can make a tired face read more downturned — but the angle between the canthi has not moved. Worth doing for other reasons; not this one.
Devices and massage. Nothing applied externally repositions the lateral canthal tendon.
We say this not to be discouraging but because the alternative is spending money on things that were never going to work.
A good share of the searching on this term is people after a list of models or actors with downturned eyes, usually to settle an argument about whether it looks good. There is no such list here, and that is deliberate.
The reason is the one this page has already spent a whole section on: you cannot read a canthal tilt off a published photograph. Editorial and red-carpet images are shot on long lenses from chosen heights, retouched, and picked from hundreds of frames. Camera height by itself moves the measured angle by more than the width of a band. A list built from those images is measuring the photographer.
The part that does hold: faces people find striking cover the whole range. Downturned eyes get read as gentle, open and expressive often enough that the look is a deliberate goal in some years and the thing being corrected in others. The tilt describes where two points sit. It is not a score, and the strength of feeling attached to it online is not evidence that it matters.
Canthal tilt is reported in three bands, and the boundaries between them are conventions rather than real lines. If your measurement came out elsewhere:
Wondering what can actually be changed? What moves a canthal tilt and what does not goes through brows, liner, camera angle and what surgery involves.
Wondering how the bands relate to each other? Negative vs positive canthal tilt compares all three side by side.
The line from your inner eye corner to your outer eye corner, measured against the horizontal. If the outer corner sits lower than the inner one, the tilt is negative and the eye reads as downturned. On this site anything below 0 degrees is called negative, 0 to 2 degrees level, and 2 degrees and above positive.
No. It is a description of where two points sit, not a defect. Downturned eyes are commonly read as gentle and approachable, and plenty of widely admired faces have them. The looksmaxxing framing that treats negative tilt as something to fix is an opinion presented as a fact.
Take a front-facing photo with the camera level with your eyes and your chin neutral, then run the free canthal tilt test on this site. It finds both eye corners from a 478-point face model, measures each eye separately and averages them. The measurement happens in your browser and the photo is never uploaded.
Head pitch. Tipping your chin down or shooting from above adds apparent positive tilt; lifting your chin or shooting from below removes it. A few degrees of head angle moves the number more than anything you could do to your face, which is why the same person gets different readings from different selfies.
Because almost nobody is symmetrical. Left and right routinely differ in eyelid height, brow height and canthal position, so a degree or two between your own eyes is unremarkable. Part of what you are seeing may also be the photo: a slightly turned head foreshortens the eye further from the camera and shifts its measured angle. The test on this site reports each eye separately and the gap between them, so shoot twice in separate sessions and compare the gap rather than a single reading.
Mostly the structure underneath: the shape of the bony orbital rim and how far the cheekbone projects beneath it, the height at which the outer corner attaches to that rim, and how well the lower lid is supported. Those are largely inherited and stable in adulthood, although support in this area does change gradually with age. It is not caused by anything you are or are not doing.
You cannot move the canthi themselves without surgery, and this site gives no surgical advice. What does change how the eye reads: brow shape (especially not letting the tail drop), eyeliner extended upward at the outer corner, lash emphasis on the outer third, and camera angle. Those change the impression, not the anatomy, and that distinction is worth keeping straight.
Yes. Published measurements cluster a few degrees positive with a wide spread on either side, and the figure varies by population and by how the measurement is taken. Being below the average is ordinary, not unusual.
The free test finds both eye corners, measures each eye against the horizontal and averages them. Nothing is uploaded — the measurement runs in your browser.
Front-facing, unobstructed, evenly lit photos work best. Your photo is analysed on your phone or computer and is never uploaded.
Your shape is a starting point. The report uses your measured proportions to explain hair and frame choices.
US$12.99 US$6.99 46% off One-time payment. No subscription, no account.
Your report link and receipt go here (optional, checkout asks too)
Next: secure checkout by Waffo, charged in USD.
Checkout could not open just now. Leave your email and we will tell you the moment it is fixed.
Got it, thanks.
Not happy within 7 days? Email us for a full refund.
Explore a sample before you decide. Your own report uses your measurements; these examples show the format, not your result.


Existing demo images. A styling simulation, not a prediction. The report includes 6 optional AI renders; each is generated on request.
Softly rectangular frames with moderate lens depth and a frame width close to the face
Excerpt from the published sampleReshape the hair silhouette with crown lift, below-jaw length, and controlled sides.